Capturing a person in words (an impossibility?)
People expect when they see a short biography a snapshot of a person, a condensed version of a whole. And they expect this version to accurately reflect a person, or simply don’t care if it doesn’t. An ‘About the Author” column of less than three hundred words is expected to describe and contain an entire person. But how? How can such a short piece of space a short statement explain a person? There is only one short statement I can think of that truly encapsulates a person: “I am what I am”. The obsession with brevity with easily summed up explanations, the summaries, the Cole’s Notes if you will of a person.
An author’s leaflet, their three hundred words, does not, and indeed cannot, tell you about them. Their writing will undoubtedly tell you more. I cannot describe myself in words numbering onward past three thousand. I have often mused upon this wondering if it is because I honestly do not know how to define myself, or if it is simply impossible to do so in the written, or spoken word. We can capture events, likes and dislikes. We can capture appearances and even make a shallow dive into the waters of our individuality, but language I believe is not encompassing enough, does not have enough flexibility not does it have the scope or range necessary to define a person. If this is so then it explains why we, human beings, so tied to our language written and spoken long to condense ourselves into a short orderly and understandable entity that fits with what we have constructed around ourselves as our definition of the world. It explains our desire to have others condensed into this format as well. For if we are enigmas unto ourselves than what can be said about the others that we wander among every day these people we pass, we speak to, we notice, we do not notice. Are these attempts to condense a person into words, to use language to give humanity a definable structure… are these made in order to give us a sense of security in that it is possible, that we are not to forever remain a mystery to ourselves? Or is it not for a sense of security it gives us but a grasping at an attempt to find that security?
Anyone, however, who has sat down and tried to write a short biography, whether for a teacher of long times past, for some profile, or for any reason can see immediately the problems inherit in these attempts.
What can be said about yourself what can you say in that blank space that allows you only the luxury of so many characters? You can add an amusing anecdote maybe, give an abbreviated version of your life; tell people what you like or if you prefer what you dislike. But what do these tell you about a person? Nothing more than these outer layers. Many people would disagree with me here saying that these make up what you are that they are deeper than the surface layer that most people consider to be looks…. But what are these things if not appearances in another guise?
Yes, one may like The Lord of the Rings, may describe why, speak of their favourite characters and events… but even then they are bounded by language, by the understanding of the person to which they relate this. And knowing all this does it give you any greater insight as to who that person really is…. And I’m not talking about the oft-told stories of old men pretending to be twelve-year-old girls on the Internet but about the core of a person. And should such things be revealed in any case?
I find myself asking many rhetorical questions on this topic but they are questions I have asked myself many times. (As I have said before, I am sure; I sometimes think that the asking of the questions and the thinking on them is more important than the answers).
Can we abbreviate ourselves into these nice, neat packages and expect some resemblance to ourselves, some truth about who we are enter the page.
I was born and have lived in Edmonton my whole life. I have to younger siblings. I play the violin, like to read books, enjoy writing, and have a strange addiction to tea.
What does this tell you about me? Nothing important, and in fact next to nothing. The only access to the person behind the words is in style and tone. The only hint of me is the extended list (more than the natural three), the faulty parallelism (yes sometimes it’s a stylistic device not just a headache inducer), the interesting addition of a seemingly unrelated fact about me and tea. And even these small windows, tell you very little… very, very little…
Do the author’s explanations on the back of their books reveal anything more than this? I don’t believe they do. Oh you can catch a glimpse of a person through the breaks in their words, but no more than a glimpse. In reading this you will see a small portion of my thoughts, one of many strands of thought going on, as I follow what seems to be one strand there are hundreds of other thoughts being followed less actively by my fingers… and these are inaccessible to anyone, sometimes including myself as they move into the subconscious back drawer of my untidy mind. There are a million occurrences small and large, a million thoughts, happenstances, etc that led me to first catch this thought. There are thousands of small reasons that have me sitting at this computer typing this (though the largest one is a large bout and annoying onset of insomnia). There are other things other sensations, other thoughts traversing my mind that have nothing to do with this musing. There is the music that I am listening to and hum along to absentmindedly, there is the warmth of my cat sitting, curled up on my lap. There are so many details that cannot be transmuted into words, so many things that cannot be related from person to person, so many things that we are not even aware of ourselves…
Perhaps it is this vastness of human nature that leads us towards our preference towards the short and simple… the simple vastness that is our own mind, our own body, our own existence frightens us and so we attempt to shrink it down… make it less than it is so that we can pretend to understand it.
Or perhaps it is laziness that drives us to hide behind few words to describe such a concept.
<> Or perhaps it is simply the desire to fill that empty space on a book’s cover and the brevity forced by that concept.Or even still it may just be that we do not wish to step from behind the enigma of our words, to reveal the person beneath them, afraid of the reaction of others should we do so… or simply because we enjoy remaining mysterious like many of the characters we write and read about every day.
Human nature – the eternal enigma – why do we do what we do? Why do we feel as we do? Questions that are simple enough to ask, difficult to answer, and even more difficult to wonder about. Our own minds… is it possible to know them, to understand them? And then if we can unlock the key to ourselves is it possible to even contemplate doing so with another person? Are these words these simple, small biographies a means of access, an attempt at access or simply a device that obscures the whole making it easier for us to believe that we can make sense of ourselves.
Words I do not believe can truly be the window to a person’s self…. Though I often wonder if they cannot help show us the way when used carefully rather than being thrown, tossed back and forth as carelessly as a small child (or myself) blows the seeds of a dandelion over the lawn. It is a conundrum we face in this pursuit for how to describe ourselves.
I have frequently called myself “one big bag of contradictions” and I truly do feel like this often. I laugh and cry at the same time, I feel tired yet wide-awake, I am quiet yet loud. But these are simply surface… I feel quite often at odds with myself unsure of which dichotomy I favour or indeed prefer… it is why writing a simple position paper often proves difficult… not the writing, no that is the easy part… but choosing a position… oh to do such a thing is difficult. I am often called, and call myself indecisive and I am, oh I really and truly am extremely indecisive… but it is not because I am lazy or do not care… no I care very much it is simply my dichotomies fighting again…
And here I see I have drifted out on a tangent, and reading over that last paragraph I see how I got to the topic of this meandering musing, how inadequate those words those phrases are how not true they appear in this black print… I look at it and cannot help thinking that some may think that these words suggest I’m insane… oh I’ve never claimed to be sane… I truly don’t think anyone is completely sane… but I also don’t think I’m insane… as I speak there it looks as though I am speaking of myself as being multiple people…. But the dichotomies are simply part of the whole and without them I would not be me…
How can we describe ourselves shortly and concisely only in one way?
We are who we are. And as a favourite author of mine (of which there are many but in this case it’s Terry Goodkind) has written, “we can be nothing more or less than we are”**
**(Note: It’s very, very early in the morning at a time most would consider late at night… I did not look up the quotation and so it may not be completely accurate but its close enough I think that it does not matter very much)

